Today’s New York Times Book Review has Christopher Hitchens weighing in on the latest Harry Potter book as only Hitchens can. Hilter, Stalin, George Orwell, Eton, Sir Oswald Mosley, Tom Brown, Kipling, Shakespeare, Beowulf, Latin incantations, “his holiness the pope”, Kantian, Russellian, Manichean, Gestapo, gulag, George W. Bush, anti-Semitism, Perry Mason, Ian Fleming, Walter Bagehot and Arthur Conan Doyle are all invoked. It may even be a positive review although one can’t really be sure.
About Me
I’m Charles Fitzgerald and this is my blog. I write infrequently and nominally on the economics of platforms, or whatever else captures my interest.
Follow Me on Twitter.-
Recent Posts
Archives
Tag Cloud
Amazon Android Apple AT&T Bailouts Boeing Books Bots China Cloud Computing eBooks Economics Education Facebook Finance Flight Simulator Google Historical Footnotes HP IBM Japan Korea Meta Microsoft Mozilla Netbooks Newspapers New York Times Oracle Pirates Policy Politics Robodialers Salesforce.com Second Life Senator Blowhard Ships Smart Ass Software Sony Sun Microsystems Technology Uncertainty Unsolicited Advice WikipediaMeta
It’s not a particularly positive review, unless you’re looking for a book that is "tedious," "tiresome" and "derivative." If that’s what you’re after, Hitchens would probably recommend HP7 without reservation.–John