<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Platformonomics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.platformonomics.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.platformonomics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBM: How Much Longer Do the Good Times Last? by trexibmer</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/03/ibm-how-much-longer-do-the-good-times-last/comment-page-1/#comment-75011</link>
		<dc:creator>trexibmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=544#comment-75011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely dead on analysis of IBM except the good times have been gone for a long, long, long time for IBM unless you are a  greedy rich IBM executive!  IBM purposely deep sixed RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL in favor of  DO ALL TO WORSHIP AND GROW EPS.

P.S. Gosh I look so young in the photo! Extinction has it&#039;s advantages, eh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely dead on analysis of IBM except the good times have been gone for a long, long, long time for IBM unless you are a  greedy rich IBM executive!  IBM purposely deep sixed RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL in favor of  DO ALL TO WORSHIP AND GROW EPS.</p>
<p>P.S. Gosh I look so young in the photo! Extinction has it&#8217;s advantages, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBM: How Much Longer Do the Good Times Last? by fin_eng</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/03/ibm-how-much-longer-do-the-good-times-last/comment-page-1/#comment-74975</link>
		<dc:creator>fin_eng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=544#comment-74975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most tech companies eventually reach the phase of &quot;financial engineering&quot; .. Google is an exception. They seem to be randomly getting involved in various sectors with the hope one will click. In the interim the advertisement model of churning revenues reaps. I see nothing unusual what IBM is doing. Mature companies dont like competition and do not innovate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most tech companies eventually reach the phase of &#8220;financial engineering&#8221; .. Google is an exception. They seem to be randomly getting involved in various sectors with the hope one will click. In the interim the advertisement model of churning revenues reaps. I see nothing unusual what IBM is doing. Mature companies dont like competition and do not innovate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Press Releases We&#8217;d Like to See: Iceland Embraces the Bitcoin Economy by Charles Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/05/press-releases-wed-like-to-see-iceland-embraces-the-bitcoin-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-74667</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=592#comment-74667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tragically, not yet. This is still just wishful thinking on my part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tragically, not yet. This is still just wishful thinking on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Press Releases We&#8217;d Like to See: Iceland Embraces the Bitcoin Economy by berke</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/05/press-releases-wed-like-to-see-iceland-embraces-the-bitcoin-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-74666</link>
		<dc:creator>berke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=592#comment-74666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a link to official government program?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a link to official government program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for Some New Adventures by Goodbye VMware</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/04/time-for-some-new-adventures/comment-page-1/#comment-74490</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodbye VMware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 22:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=565#comment-74490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] excellent 18 months, and good luck with your new adventure Pivotal team! I want to specially thank Charles Fitzgerald, who was my manager, but whom I consider more like a mentor and a friend, for teaching me developer [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent 18 months, and good luck with your new adventure Pivotal team! I want to specially thank Charles Fitzgerald, who was my manager, but whom I consider more like a mentor and a friend, for teaching me developer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rise of the Machines &#8211; A Reading List by Peter E</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2012/09/the-rise-of-the-machines-a-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-74390</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=535#comment-74390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robopocalypse is a great read, though I should confess I did as an audible book. As you may know, audible books can be made or borken with a good narrator.  This one had a great narrator.  It&#039;s fun, but though-provoking (in a light way). I&#039;d elevate it on your list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robopocalypse is a great read, though I should confess I did as an audible book. As you may know, audible books can be made or borken with a good narrator.  This one had a great narrator.  It&#8217;s fun, but though-provoking (in a light way). I&#8217;d elevate it on your list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for Some New Adventures by Jody Peake</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/04/time-for-some-new-adventures/comment-page-1/#comment-73926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody Peake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 23:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=565#comment-73926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait to see more about your next steps.. Congratulations, Charles!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see more about your next steps.. Congratulations, Charles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for Some New Adventures by Tim Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/04/time-for-some-new-adventures/comment-page-1/#comment-73275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=565#comment-73275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good luck Charles!

FYI - the placement of the image credit looks like the author/tagline for the article... I spent a few seconds trying to get the joke.

Tim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck Charles!</p>
<p>FYI &#8211; the placement of the image credit looks like the author/tagline for the article&#8230; I spent a few seconds trying to get the joke.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consulting by Time for Some New Adventures &#124; Platformonomics</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/consulting/comment-page-1/#comment-73274</link>
		<dc:creator>Time for Some New Adventures &#124; Platformonomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?page_id=540#comment-73274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Consulting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consulting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Very Targeted Tax Cut by Charles Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://www.platformonomics.com/2013/04/a-very-targeted-tax-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-72515</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformonomics.com/?p=550#comment-72515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zigurd,

I don&#039;t know about the hardware requirements, but you can get a sub-$300 Windows 8 laptop that doesn&#039;t completely suck. But it sucks for the OEM if netbook pricing is the new norm. Microsoft is hoping the next wave of OEM hardware is going to be a lot more compelling. We&#039;ll see.

On the two OS strategy, that is the path Microsoft has gone down with Windows Phone 7 (and predecessors), but there are a ton of things pushing them to single OS/app model across PC/tablet/phone - developer leverage, economic efficiency, etc. Apple gets this efficiency today while Microsoft will spend more time getting to this as opposed to delivering customer value. I don&#039;t think Windows&#039; problem is being robust and performant.

Ironically, Microsoft did the opposite of what it has historically done (Windows PC first, new market as bolt-on to Windows); with Windows 8 they optimized for the new market and undermined the traditional PC market. With no tablet traction, it is the worst of all worlds. The big question is whether Windows Blue will be pragmatic or a continuation of the previous absolutist course.

I&#039;m less optimistic about the conglomerate model. The last ten years show management has spent its time fixing one crisis after another and not leading. I think the businesses do better without the overhead and strategy taxes, especially Office and Server &amp; Tools which now look like the majority of MSFT market cap. These businesses get sublimated to Windows in the conglomerate model (the new MS corporate logo is exhibit one for this argument).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zigurd,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about the hardware requirements, but you can get a sub-$300 Windows 8 laptop that doesn&#8217;t completely suck. But it sucks for the OEM if netbook pricing is the new norm. Microsoft is hoping the next wave of OEM hardware is going to be a lot more compelling. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>On the two OS strategy, that is the path Microsoft has gone down with Windows Phone 7 (and predecessors), but there are a ton of things pushing them to single OS/app model across PC/tablet/phone &#8211; developer leverage, economic efficiency, etc. Apple gets this efficiency today while Microsoft will spend more time getting to this as opposed to delivering customer value. I don&#8217;t think Windows&#8217; problem is being robust and performant.</p>
<p>Ironically, Microsoft did the opposite of what it has historically done (Windows PC first, new market as bolt-on to Windows); with Windows 8 they optimized for the new market and undermined the traditional PC market. With no tablet traction, it is the worst of all worlds. The big question is whether Windows Blue will be pragmatic or a continuation of the previous absolutist course.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m less optimistic about the conglomerate model. The last ten years show management has spent its time fixing one crisis after another and not leading. I think the businesses do better without the overhead and strategy taxes, especially Office and Server &#038; Tools which now look like the majority of MSFT market cap. These businesses get sublimated to Windows in the conglomerate model (the new MS corporate logo is exhibit one for this argument).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
